BERANDA ABOUT US ADS : 1 USD FOREVER ASMARA BIOGRAFI BUKU BUKU PINTAR
CHRISTIAN FAITH DISCLAIMER DUNIA KERJA ENTREPRENEURS GO PUBLIC (IPO)
KESEHATAN LIST OF ALL ARTICLES MARKETING MY STARTUP OTHERS
TIP SUKSES DAN KAYA TIPS BLOGGER TIP SEO CONTACT ME PROFESSIONAL WRITER
On Page SEO in 2016: A (2M Keyword) Data Driven Analysis
UPDATE: Initially this article contained quite a bit of controversy – we’ll freely admit that this was to get a bit of extra attention and spark conversations. But this controversy backfired a little, so we decided to remove all of it from this article and only leave the research data and some takeaways/recommendations where relevant.
Google’s algorithms are evolving all the time.
Back in the day you could “stuff” your page with a bunch of keywords you wanted to rank for and that alone would help to improve your rankings. This was of course very open to manipulation.
But in 2016 we have Hummingbird, Rank Brain, semantic search and many other nifty technologies – Google has evolved far beyond just looking if you have a keyword in your Title or not.
And besides, we’ve all noticed that pages often rank on the front page of Google without even having the target keyword mentioned anywhere in their content.
So does this mean you should no longer worry about optimizing your page for a specific keyword and just let Google figure out what your page is all about?
Well, we have studied the correlations of different on page SEO factors with Google rankings across 2 Million random keyword searches and even thoughcorrelation is not causation, the takeaways are very interesting in a lot of cases.
UPDATE: Initially this article contained quite a bit of controversy – we’ll freely admit that this was to get a bit of extra attention and spark conversations. But this controversy backfired a little, so we decided to remove all of it from this article and only leave the research data and some takeaways/recommendations where relevant.
Google’s algorithms are evolving all the time.
Back in the day you could “stuff” your page with a bunch of keywords you wanted to rank for and that alone would help to improve your rankings. This was of course very open to manipulation.
But in 2016 we have Hummingbird, Rank Brain, semantic search and many other nifty technologies – Google has evolved far beyond just looking if you have a keyword in your Title or not.
And besides, we’ve all noticed that pages often rank on the front page of Google without even having the target keyword mentioned anywhere in their content.
So does this mean you should no longer worry about optimizing your page for a specific keyword and just let Google figure out what your page is all about?
Well, we have studied the correlations of different on page SEO factors with Google rankings across 2 Million random keyword searches and even thoughcorrelation is not causation, the takeaways are very interesting in a lot of cases.
What is “On Page SEO”?
“On page SEO” refers to a set of web page optimization best practices that you can apply to the pages of your website in order to improve their ranking in search engine results.
The majority of on page SEO advice that can be seen around the web revolves around using the exact match keyword that you want to rank for in a few “strategic” places of your page: Title, H1, meta description, content etc.
But this kind of advice is actually outdated, because in 2016 Google is sophisticated enough to understand synonyms (and overall relevance of the page), meaning you no longer have to obsess about exact match keyword usage.
When people who are fairly new to SEO are picking a keyword to rank for, they might look at the SERP and see that none of the top10 pages has a “perfect” on page SEO for this exact keyword:
Isn’t this a great opportunity to rank with their own “perfectly optimized” page?
I’m afraid it’s not.
The fact that these pages don’t have your exact match keyword in a bunch of “strategic” places, doesn’t mean that they are not relevant to the search query.
According to our data, the usage of exact match keyword in Title, URL, H1 or even within the actual content of the page doesn’t have a significant correlation with Google rankings.
If we were to study “partial match” keyword usage, synonyms and “LSI keywords”(which we’re about to) – the results would most likely be different.
But “on page SEO” doesn’t end with using the keyword you want to rank for in the content of your page, right?
It also implies quite a few “general” optimizations that should make your page better in the eyes of search engines (and searchers), such as:
So let’s take a look at the correlations of all these on page SEO factors and compare them to backlink factors:
“On page SEO” refers to a set of web page optimization best practices that you can apply to the pages of your website in order to improve their ranking in search engine results.
The majority of on page SEO advice that can be seen around the web revolves around using the exact match keyword that you want to rank for in a few “strategic” places of your page: Title, H1, meta description, content etc.
But this kind of advice is actually outdated, because in 2016 Google is sophisticated enough to understand synonyms (and overall relevance of the page), meaning you no longer have to obsess about exact match keyword usage.
When people who are fairly new to SEO are picking a keyword to rank for, they might look at the SERP and see that none of the top10 pages has a “perfect” on page SEO for this exact keyword:
Isn’t this a great opportunity to rank with their own “perfectly optimized” page?
I’m afraid it’s not.
The fact that these pages don’t have your exact match keyword in a bunch of “strategic” places, doesn’t mean that they are not relevant to the search query.
According to our data, the usage of exact match keyword in Title, URL, H1 or even within the actual content of the page doesn’t have a significant correlation with Google rankings.
If we were to study “partial match” keyword usage, synonyms and “LSI keywords”(which we’re about to) – the results would most likely be different.
But “on page SEO” doesn’t end with using the keyword you want to rank for in the content of your page, right?
It also implies quite a few “general” optimizations that should make your page better in the eyes of search engines (and searchers), such as:
So let’s take a look at the correlations of all these on page SEO factors and compare them to backlink factors:
How “On Page SEO” Factors Correlate With Google Rank
At this point I’d like to mention one more time that correlation is not causation.
These correlations show you the common traits of the pages that tend to rank well, but they do not necessarily imply that these pages rank well because of these traits.
Correlation is measured on a scale from -1 to 1 with “0” meaning “no correlation at all”. And as you can see, all the most popular on page SEO factors that we studied hardly reach 0.1 mark.
You can clearly see that on page SEO factors that revolve around using an exact match keyword in “strategic” places of your page showed a very small correlation.
SIDENOTE
We didn’t study the correlation of “partial match” keywords, synonyms and “LSI keywords” this time. But once we do – we will update this article with more data.
Another interesting graph would be this one:
Such a huge difference in correlations suggests that backlinks have much more influence on your page’s rankings than usage of exact match keyword in the copy.
But even though our research data suggests that usage of exact match keyword on your page has a very low correlation with Google rankings, this doesn’t mean that you should completely refrain from using it.
So let’s look at each on page factor one by one and discuss if you should or should not care about it.
SIDENOTE
our research was based on a sample size of 2M keywords, but there were times we had to reduce this number in order to study certain factors in isolation.
For most of the below experiments we tried to exclude the influence of backlinks by focusing on SERPs where top 10 ranking pages had similar DR and UR (the standard deviation is less than 30% of their Average value).
For each of the experiments we calculated 4 correlations:
- Across all keywords;
- High-volume keywords only (50k+ searches per month);
- Medium-volume keywords only (20k-50k searches per month;)
- Low-volume keywords only (less than 20k searches per month).
If you have any questions about the methodology behind any of the below experiments – just post them in the comments section at the end of this article (or tweet me @timsoulo).
At this point I’d like to mention one more time that correlation is not causation.
These correlations show you the common traits of the pages that tend to rank well, but they do not necessarily imply that these pages rank well because of these traits.
Correlation is measured on a scale from -1 to 1 with “0” meaning “no correlation at all”. And as you can see, all the most popular on page SEO factors that we studied hardly reach 0.1 mark.
You can clearly see that on page SEO factors that revolve around using an exact match keyword in “strategic” places of your page showed a very small correlation.
SIDENOTEWe didn’t study the correlation of “partial match” keywords, synonyms and “LSI keywords” this time. But once we do – we will update this article with more data.
Another interesting graph would be this one:
Such a huge difference in correlations suggests that backlinks have much more influence on your page’s rankings than usage of exact match keyword in the copy.
But even though our research data suggests that usage of exact match keyword on your page has a very low correlation with Google rankings, this doesn’t mean that you should completely refrain from using it.
So let’s look at each on page factor one by one and discuss if you should or should not care about it.
SIDENOTEour research was based on a sample size of 2M keywords, but there were times we had to reduce this number in order to study certain factors in isolation.
For most of the below experiments we tried to exclude the influence of backlinks by focusing on SERPs where top 10 ranking pages had similar DR and UR (the standard deviation is less than 30% of their Average value).
For each of the experiments we calculated 4 correlations:
- Across all keywords;
- High-volume keywords only (50k+ searches per month);
- Medium-volume keywords only (20k-50k searches per month;)
- Low-volume keywords only (less than 20k searches per month).
If you have any questions about the methodology behind any of the below experiments – just post them in the comments section at the end of this article (or tweet me @timsoulo).
Usage of Exact Match Keyword
First of all let’s look at how using the exact match keyword in a few “strategic” places of your page correlates with Google rankings.
TL;DR: all our experiments with exact match keyword usage in different places of a page(code) showed a very small correlation with Google ranking.
First of all let’s look at how using the exact match keyword in a few “strategic” places of your page correlates with Google rankings.
TL;DR: all our experiments with exact match keyword usage in different places of a page(code) showed a very small correlation with Google ranking.
1. Keyword in Domain Name
Back in 2012 Google rolled out an update that was meant to decrease the value of the so-called EMDs (Exact Match Domains).
By looking at our graph it may seem that EMDs are still in the game, because there’s clearly a “jump” in position #1.
But I believe that this “jump” is caused by so-called “branded keywords”.
For example, if you search Google for “addicting games” – you’ll notice that it’s actually a brand name for a popular gaming website, which ranks #1 for the term:
The correlation of 0.0877 may seem pretty high (compared to other on page SEO factors), but if we were to re-calculate it without that #1 position I’m sure it would drop a lot.
Please also note that we didn’t focus on EMDs exclusively, but counted any website that contained an exact match keyword as part of its domain name.
RECOMMENDATION
Can you “coin” a certain keyword by using it in your domain name and building your brand around it?
YES, you can!
I did just that with my WP plugin called “Content Upgrades PRO” that resides under the “contentupgradespro.com” domain name.
And it ranks quite well for the keyword “content upgrades” – apart from the fact that it can’t outrank Brian Dean’s article that’s not even nearly optimized for this keyword (but has tons of backlinks):
Is EMD a strong ranking signal? I don’t think so.
Back in 2012 Google rolled out an update that was meant to decrease the value of the so-called EMDs (Exact Match Domains).
By looking at our graph it may seem that EMDs are still in the game, because there’s clearly a “jump” in position #1.
But I believe that this “jump” is caused by so-called “branded keywords”.
For example, if you search Google for “addicting games” – you’ll notice that it’s actually a brand name for a popular gaming website, which ranks #1 for the term:
The correlation of 0.0877 may seem pretty high (compared to other on page SEO factors), but if we were to re-calculate it without that #1 position I’m sure it would drop a lot.
Please also note that we didn’t focus on EMDs exclusively, but counted any website that contained an exact match keyword as part of its domain name.
RECOMMENDATIONCan you “coin” a certain keyword by using it in your domain name and building your brand around it?
YES, you can!
I did just that with my WP plugin called “Content Upgrades PRO” that resides under the “contentupgradespro.com” domain name.
And it ranks quite well for the keyword “content upgrades” – apart from the fact that it can’t outrank Brian Dean’s article that’s not even nearly optimized for this keyword (but has tons of backlinks):
Is EMD a strong ranking signal? I don’t think so.
2. Keyword in URL
Interestingly, out of all “keyword-related” on page SEO factors that we’ve studied this was the only one that showed a negative correlation.
So does this mean that Google doesn’t use “keyword in URL” as a ranking factor?
Well, just recently John Mueller of Google has stated the following:
I believe that is a very small ranking factor. So it is not something I’d really try to force. And it is not something I’d say it is even worth your effort to restructure your site just so you can get keywords in your URL.
RECOMMENDATION
Here at Ahrefs we’re huge advocates of the so-called “descriptive URLs”.
Here’s why:
- You can copy/paste a descriptive URL in your online conversations and people will know what your page is about before even clicking on the link;
- This kind of link will automatically contain your target keyword as part of the anchor text;
- Google will highlight the keyword that you’re searching for in the URL of the search snippet.
So if you’re still using URLs that look like “mywebstore.com/?product_id=7924Gh” – you should definitely rethink that format.
But just like John Mueller has stated – I don’t believe that changing your existing URLs to include a target keyword will lead to any significant increase in rankings.
Interestingly, out of all “keyword-related” on page SEO factors that we’ve studied this was the only one that showed a negative correlation.
So does this mean that Google doesn’t use “keyword in URL” as a ranking factor?
Well, just recently John Mueller of Google has stated the following:
I believe that is a very small ranking factor. So it is not something I’d really try to force. And it is not something I’d say it is even worth your effort to restructure your site just so you can get keywords in your URL.
RECOMMENDATIONHere at Ahrefs we’re huge advocates of the so-called “descriptive URLs”.
Here’s why:
- You can copy/paste a descriptive URL in your online conversations and people will know what your page is about before even clicking on the link;
- This kind of link will automatically contain your target keyword as part of the anchor text;
- Google will highlight the keyword that you’re searching for in the URL of the search snippet.
So if you’re still using URLs that look like “mywebstore.com/?product_id=7924Gh” – you should definitely rethink that format.
But just like John Mueller has stated – I don’t believe that changing your existing URLs to include a target keyword will lead to any significant increase in rankings.
3. Keyword in Title
As you can tell by looking at this graph, the vast majority of pages that rank on the front page of Google don’t have exact match keyword in their “Title” tags.
Funnily, even the #2 result for “on page SEO” doesn’t have the exact match keyword in its “Title” tag:
SIDENOTE
As David has pointed out in our discussion of this experiment, the Moz’s Title on my screenshot does have all three words of the target keyword in it, but not in exact match order.
But in this research we’ve only studied the effect of “exact match keyword” and omitted any partial match occurrences or synonyms.
If you scroll down that SERP you’ll see that the Titles of #4 and #6 results are not “perfect” either.
So does this mean that “on page SEO” is an easy keyword to rank for if you use “exact match keyword” targeting on your page?
Not at all!
RECOMMENDATION
Search for any keyword in Google and you’ll notice that it is no longer highlighted in the Titles of the search snippets as it used to be:
That might be a hint that Google is de-valuing the importance of having an exact match keyword in the Title.
Looks like they want searchers to actually read Titles before deciding which one to click, rather than quickly skim through to find where the exact match keyword is highlighted.
So do I recommend putting your target keyword in the Title of your page?
I’d say it depends.
You can often craft a very catchy Title without a keyword in it and still rank well:
But will using an exact match keyword in the “Title” tag of your page make it rank better?
Probably not!
Unless of course your page doesn’t have any other content on it and the Title is the only clue that Google can get about it.
Like in this experiment by Distilled, where targeting a different keyword in the Titles and H1s of their pages actually improved search traffic.
But I’ll get back to commenting on this experiment in the section about H1 tag.
As you can tell by looking at this graph, the vast majority of pages that rank on the front page of Google don’t have exact match keyword in their “Title” tags.
Funnily, even the #2 result for “on page SEO” doesn’t have the exact match keyword in its “Title” tag:
SIDENOTEAs David has pointed out in our discussion of this experiment, the Moz’s Title on my screenshot does have all three words of the target keyword in it, but not in exact match order.
But in this research we’ve only studied the effect of “exact match keyword” and omitted any partial match occurrences or synonyms.
If you scroll down that SERP you’ll see that the Titles of #4 and #6 results are not “perfect” either.
So does this mean that “on page SEO” is an easy keyword to rank for if you use “exact match keyword” targeting on your page?
Not at all!
RECOMMENDATIONSearch for any keyword in Google and you’ll notice that it is no longer highlighted in the Titles of the search snippets as it used to be:
That might be a hint that Google is de-valuing the importance of having an exact match keyword in the Title.
Looks like they want searchers to actually read Titles before deciding which one to click, rather than quickly skim through to find where the exact match keyword is highlighted.
So do I recommend putting your target keyword in the Title of your page?
I’d say it depends.
You can often craft a very catchy Title without a keyword in it and still rank well:
But will using an exact match keyword in the “Title” tag of your page make it rank better?
Probably not!
Unless of course your page doesn’t have any other content on it and the Title is the only clue that Google can get about it.
Like in this experiment by Distilled, where targeting a different keyword in the Titles and H1s of their pages actually improved search traffic.
But I’ll get back to commenting on this experiment in the section about H1 tag.
4. Keyword in the beginning of the Title
I wanted to study this ranking factor in isolation, so we only looked at the SERPs where keyword was present in the Titles of all top10 pages.
And that experiment resulted in a very small positive correlation.
RECOMMENDATION
The correlation numbers behind this experiment suggest that Google might actually be using this as one of their ranking factors (a very-very weak one).
But I believe that using an exact match keyword at the beginning of your Title doesn’t give you any significant advantage over pages that don’t.
So if the Titles of the top 10 pages in a SERP don’t start with a target keyword – you should not consider this as an easy ranking opportunity.
I wanted to study this ranking factor in isolation, so we only looked at the SERPs where keyword was present in the Titles of all top10 pages.
And that experiment resulted in a very small positive correlation.
RECOMMENDATIONThe correlation numbers behind this experiment suggest that Google might actually be using this as one of their ranking factors (a very-very weak one).
But I believe that using an exact match keyword at the beginning of your Title doesn’t give you any significant advantage over pages that don’t.
So if the Titles of the top 10 pages in a SERP don’t start with a target keyword – you should not consider this as an easy ranking opportunity.
5. Keyword in Meta Description
First of all we studied how many SERPs in our data sample had the “meta description” tag filled in:
And it looks like the vast majority of pages ranking in Google top 10 don’t have meta descriptions.
Which kind of implies that filling in this tag is not crucial for your rankings.
Then we took the segment of SERPs where all 10 “meta description” tags were filled in and studied if using exact match keyword within this tag correlated with rankings:
And again, over 50% of all meta descriptions don’t have a target keyword in them and the correlation with Google ranking is very close to 0.
RECOMMENDATION
Should you fill in the “meta description” tag for every page on your website?
I’d say it’s recommended, but not crucial for ranking well.
In most cases Google will omit your “meta description” anyway and just pull a short excerpt from the content of your page (that it thinks is the most relevant to a user’s search query):
And yet, as much as I hate filling in “meta descriptions”, they just have to be polished for a few core pages of your website:
All in all, I don’t believe that using an exact match keyword in your “meta description” tag will improve the rankings of your page.
So you probably shouldn’t take this factor into account when analyzing your chances to rank for a certain keyword.
First of all we studied how many SERPs in our data sample had the “meta description” tag filled in:
And it looks like the vast majority of pages ranking in Google top 10 don’t have meta descriptions.
Which kind of implies that filling in this tag is not crucial for your rankings.
Then we took the segment of SERPs where all 10 “meta description” tags were filled in and studied if using exact match keyword within this tag correlated with rankings:
And again, over 50% of all meta descriptions don’t have a target keyword in them and the correlation with Google ranking is very close to 0.
RECOMMENDATIONShould you fill in the “meta description” tag for every page on your website?
I’d say it’s recommended, but not crucial for ranking well.
In most cases Google will omit your “meta description” anyway and just pull a short excerpt from the content of your page (that it thinks is the most relevant to a user’s search query):
And yet, as much as I hate filling in “meta descriptions”, they just have to be polished for a few core pages of your website:
All in all, I don’t believe that using an exact match keyword in your “meta description” tag will improve the rankings of your page.
So you probably shouldn’t take this factor into account when analyzing your chances to rank for a certain keyword.
6. Keyword in Headline (H1 tag)
Looks like 85% of pages that rank in Google top10 don’t have the keyword in their H1 tags (based on our data sample).
I guess that’s mainly due to improper use of H1 tags in the layout of web pages – our data has shown that over 70% of pages that rank in Google top10 don’t have H1 tags on them.
Sadly most web developers are still not familiar with the basics of SEO.
RECOMMENDATION
Do I recommend you to use your target keyword in the Headline of your page?
YES, I do!
Here’s why:
- Having a proper headline improves the user experience and the “scanability” of your page.This way visitors can quickly guess that they are in the right place and dive deeper into the page, which translates into all sorts of “behavioural ranking factors”.
- By framing your headline around a specific keyword or phrase you can influence how people link to you:
And as you already know, the anchor text of your backlinks (and most likely the surrounding text too) does have a certain impact on the keywords that your page will rank for.
But do I think that using an exact match keyword in the H1 tag of your page is a strong enough ranking signal in itself?
NO, I don’t think so.
Unless of course the H1 tag is the only unique content there is on your page, and the keyword you’re targeting is very-very long tail.
Like in this experiment by the guys from Distilled that I’ve mentioned earlier:
Do I recommend using a keyword that you want to rank for in your H1 tag?
YES, I do. (for the reasons mentioned above)
Looks like 85% of pages that rank in Google top10 don’t have the keyword in their H1 tags (based on our data sample).
I guess that’s mainly due to improper use of H1 tags in the layout of web pages – our data has shown that over 70% of pages that rank in Google top10 don’t have H1 tags on them.
Sadly most web developers are still not familiar with the basics of SEO.
RECOMMENDATIONDo I recommend you to use your target keyword in the Headline of your page?
YES, I do!
Here’s why:
- Having a proper headline improves the user experience and the “scanability” of your page.This way visitors can quickly guess that they are in the right place and dive deeper into the page, which translates into all sorts of “behavioural ranking factors”.
- By framing your headline around a specific keyword or phrase you can influence how people link to you:And as you already know, the anchor text of your backlinks (and most likely the surrounding text too) does have a certain impact on the keywords that your page will rank for.
But do I think that using an exact match keyword in the H1 tag of your page is a strong enough ranking signal in itself?
NO, I don’t think so.
Unless of course the H1 tag is the only unique content there is on your page, and the keyword you’re targeting is very-very long tail.
Like in this experiment by the guys from Distilled that I’ve mentioned earlier:
Do I recommend using a keyword that you want to rank for in your H1 tag?
YES, I do. (for the reasons mentioned above)
7. Keyword in Subheading (H2 tag)
This time over 93% of pages that rank in Google top 10 don’t have a target keyword in their H2 tag (based on our data sample).
So the recommendation will be very straightforward.
RECOMMENDATION
I don’t think that using exact match keyword in the H2 tag of your page will lead to any significant boost in rankings.
So when writing subheadings I advise you to think about your readers, not the search engines.
This time over 93% of pages that rank in Google top 10 don’t have a target keyword in their H2 tag (based on our data sample).
So the recommendation will be very straightforward.
RECOMMENDATIONI don’t think that using exact match keyword in the H2 tag of your page will lead to any significant boost in rankings.
So when writing subheadings I advise you to think about your readers, not the search engines.
8. Keyword in Content
Our research has shown that almost 75% of pages that rank in Google top 10 don’t have even a single mention of an exact match keyword in their content(based on our data sample).
And the correlation of this on page factor with Google rankings is very close to 0.
Initially we also wanted to study the correlation of the good old “keyword density” too, but after seeing these numbers it no longer made sense to do it.
RECOMMENDATION
Google called RankBrain their “third most important factor in the ranking algorithm along with links and content”.
This is clearly yet another hint for us SEOs to stop being obsessed about how many times we should use the exact match keyword on a page and focus on creating resources that perfectly address user intent behind a certain search query.
Our research has shown that almost 75% of pages that rank in Google top 10 don’t have even a single mention of an exact match keyword in their content(based on our data sample).
And the correlation of this on page factor with Google rankings is very close to 0.
Initially we also wanted to study the correlation of the good old “keyword density” too, but after seeing these numbers it no longer made sense to do it.
RECOMMENDATIONGoogle called RankBrain their “third most important factor in the ranking algorithm along with links and content”.
This is clearly yet another hint for us SEOs to stop being obsessed about how many times we should use the exact match keyword on a page and focus on creating resources that perfectly address user intent behind a certain search query.
9. Keyword in the first 100 words of a page
To study the correlation of this on page factor we only looked at the SERPs where all top 10 results had at least one keyword occurrence in content.
And in about 80% of cases we saw it in the first 100 words.
Though the correlation appeared to be almost non-existent.
RECOMMENDATION
My recommendation here is no different to the previous one.
When writing content for your page you should first and foremost focus on helping searchers, rather than worry about where in the content of your page this exact match keyword should appear.
To study the correlation of this on page factor we only looked at the SERPs where all top 10 results had at least one keyword occurrence in content.
And in about 80% of cases we saw it in the first 100 words.
Though the correlation appeared to be almost non-existent.
RECOMMENDATIONMy recommendation here is no different to the previous one.
When writing content for your page you should first and foremost focus on helping searchers, rather than worry about where in the content of your page this exact match keyword should appear.
10. Keyword in image “alt” tag
This is yet another case where the vast majority (70%+) of pages that rank in Google top 10 don’t have the target keyword in the “alt” tags of their images. And actually over 50% of all pages that we saw in Google top10 didn’t have their alt tags filled in.
But please be advised that we’ve studied regular search results.
For Google Image Search the results as well as the correlation would most likely be very different.
RECOMMENDATION
“Alt” tag is something that you should use to describe what’s on the image.
That’s because this text will later be used if your image didn’t load or your visitor is using a screen reader.
Most likely a descriptive “alt” tag will help your image rank higher in Google Image Search (we didn’t study that though).
But flooding your “alt” tags with keywords that you want to rank for is unlikely to move the needle.
And this wraps up the section of on page SEO factors that imply using your exact match keyword on a page.
Up next are…
This is yet another case where the vast majority (70%+) of pages that rank in Google top 10 don’t have the target keyword in the “alt” tags of their images. And actually over 50% of all pages that we saw in Google top10 didn’t have their alt tags filled in.
But please be advised that we’ve studied regular search results.
For Google Image Search the results as well as the correlation would most likely be very different.
RECOMMENDATION“Alt” tag is something that you should use to describe what’s on the image.
That’s because this text will later be used if your image didn’t load or your visitor is using a screen reader.
Most likely a descriptive “alt” tag will help your image rank higher in Google Image Search (we didn’t study that though).
But flooding your “alt” tags with keywords that you want to rank for is unlikely to move the needle.
And this wraps up the section of on page SEO factors that imply using your exact match keyword on a page.
Up next are…
General On Page SEO factors
In this section we’re going to look at the on page SEO factors that are independent from the keyword that you want to rank for.
In some cases they actually showed a much better correlation with Google ranking than “keyword-dependent” factors.
But they still look very weak when compared to backlink factors.
In this section we’re going to look at the on page SEO factors that are independent from the keyword that you want to rank for.
In some cases they actually showed a much better correlation with Google ranking than “keyword-dependent” factors.
But they still look very weak when compared to backlink factors.
1. Age of the page
Out of all the on page SEO factors that we’ve studied, this one showed the best correlation with Google rankings.
SIDENOTE
please don’t interpret this as “older pages had more time to gain more backlinks”, because like I said earlier, all on page factors were studied across SERPs with similar amount of backlinks so we coud remove their influence.
We also studied that factor from another angle – by looking at the percentage of pages that were less than 1 year old.
And here’s what we’ve got:
RECOMMENDATION
The data above (as well as our personal experience) suggests that newly published content takes quite some time to get to the first page of Google.
So if you need to grow your organic search traffic fast, consider investing your time and resources into the old pages of your site that already rank for a bunch of keywords.
With a little effort you should be able to push them up in the search results.
Here’s how:
- Update the content on these pages, make it up to date;
- Make sure your page matches “searcher’s intent” better than what’s already in top10;
- Change the “last updated” date on that page;
- Re-promote it as if it was a new page;
- Build new links.
Out of all the on page SEO factors that we’ve studied, this one showed the best correlation with Google rankings.
SIDENOTEplease don’t interpret this as “older pages had more time to gain more backlinks”, because like I said earlier, all on page factors were studied across SERPs with similar amount of backlinks so we coud remove their influence.
We also studied that factor from another angle – by looking at the percentage of pages that were less than 1 year old.
And here’s what we’ve got:
RECOMMENDATIONThe data above (as well as our personal experience) suggests that newly published content takes quite some time to get to the first page of Google.
So if you need to grow your organic search traffic fast, consider investing your time and resources into the old pages of your site that already rank for a bunch of keywords.
With a little effort you should be able to push them up in the search results.
Here’s how:
- Update the content on these pages, make it up to date;
- Make sure your page matches “searcher’s intent” better than what’s already in top10;
- Change the “last updated” date on that page;
- Re-promote it as if it was a new page;
- Build new links.
2. Using HTTPS
Looks like over 80% of pages that rank #1 in Google are not secure (based on our data sample).
But at the same time you can clearly see that the percentage of secure pages in positions 1-3 is visibly higher than in positions 4-10.
So should you consider switching to https?
RECOMMENDATION
Back in 2014 Google officially stated that they will use HTTPS as a ranking signal.
And our own research has confirmed that “https” does correlate with Google rankings (a little bit).
This is why I do recommend you to make your website secure.
Especially in case you’re collecting any kind of personal data from your visitors.
To be honest it’s very unlikely that a switch to “https” will lead to any significant boost in your rankings, but at least visitors will notice “https” in your web address and perceive your website as more trustworthy (tryLet’s Encrypt).
Looks like over 80% of pages that rank #1 in Google are not secure (based on our data sample).
But at the same time you can clearly see that the percentage of secure pages in positions 1-3 is visibly higher than in positions 4-10.
So should you consider switching to https?
RECOMMENDATIONBack in 2014 Google officially stated that they will use HTTPS as a ranking signal.
And our own research has confirmed that “https” does correlate with Google rankings (a little bit).
This is why I do recommend you to make your website secure.
Especially in case you’re collecting any kind of personal data from your visitors.
To be honest it’s very unlikely that a switch to “https” will lead to any significant boost in your rankings, but at least visitors will notice “https” in your web address and perceive your website as more trustworthy (tryLet’s Encrypt).
3. Page load time
Last year we saw some rumors that Google might have stopped considering page speed as a ranking factor.
And according to the results of our research, the correlation of this on page factor with higher position in Google is very small.
SIDENOTE
we’ve only studied the load speed of the base HTML code of the page. Ahrefs crawler doesn’t download any images, css, js, etc.
RECOMMENDATION
I believe that if your site is utterly slow (to the point when it starts to irritate your visitors) it would be totally fair if Google would give a (very small) bit of preference to sites that are faster than yours.
But if your site loads “fast enough” to keep your visitors happy, optimizing it even further and cutting down on a few dozen milliseconds might not be the best use of your time and resources.
Last year we saw some rumors that Google might have stopped considering page speed as a ranking factor.
And according to the results of our research, the correlation of this on page factor with higher position in Google is very small.
SIDENOTEwe’ve only studied the load speed of the base HTML code of the page. Ahrefs crawler doesn’t download any images, css, js, etc.
RECOMMENDATIONI believe that if your site is utterly slow (to the point when it starts to irritate your visitors) it would be totally fair if Google would give a (very small) bit of preference to sites that are faster than yours.
But if your site loads “fast enough” to keep your visitors happy, optimizing it even further and cutting down on a few dozen milliseconds might not be the best use of your time and resources.
4. Length of content
This on page factor showed the second best correlation across all on-page SEO factors that we’ve studied (the first one is “Age of the page”).
The conventional wisdom says that “long form content” (the one that tends to attract tons of backlinks and social shares) starts roughly at 1500 words.
But notice how our median value for #1 result only shows 800 words – is that “long form content”?
I think Rand Fishkin has the point here, by saying that “Great Content ≠ Long-Form Content”.
So my recommendation would be pretty much in line with this idea.
RECOMMENDATION
Even though our data has shown a relatively high correlation of content length VS Google ranking, I believe that purposely making your content longer with a goal of ranking higher is a terrible idea.
In the words of Antoine de Saint Exupéry:
“Perfection is attained, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing more to take away.”
So don’t make your pages longer just for the sake of it.
Do the opposite actually – give more value with less words.
This on page factor showed the second best correlation across all on-page SEO factors that we’ve studied (the first one is “Age of the page”).
The conventional wisdom says that “long form content” (the one that tends to attract tons of backlinks and social shares) starts roughly at 1500 words.
But notice how our median value for #1 result only shows 800 words – is that “long form content”?
I think Rand Fishkin has the point here, by saying that “Great Content ≠ Long-Form Content”.
So my recommendation would be pretty much in line with this idea.
RECOMMENDATIONEven though our data has shown a relatively high correlation of content length VS Google ranking, I believe that purposely making your content longer with a goal of ranking higher is a terrible idea.
In the words of Antoine de Saint Exupéry:
“Perfection is attained, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing more to take away.”
So don’t make your pages longer just for the sake of it.
Do the opposite actually – give more value with less words.
5. URL Length
We’ve studied the part of the URL that starts where the domain name ends:
And as you can tell from the graph above, shorter URLs tend to rank better.
So then we studied if there was any correlation with number of “folders” in URL:
Here’s how we were counting them:
And the results of this experiment are pretty much in line with the previous one.
Somehow URLs with less folders tend to rank better.
SIDENOTE
after seeing this data a few people asked us to study how “# of clicks” from Homepage correlates with Google rank. We’ve already did that and the results will be published soon here at Ahrefs blog.
RECOMMENDATION
Even though we did see a small correlation here with preference towards shorter URLs, I don’t believe this is a significant enough ranking factor.
I do recommend you to keep your URLs short, but mostly for user experience reasons and not because this will help you rank higher.
We’ve studied the part of the URL that starts where the domain name ends:
And as you can tell from the graph above, shorter URLs tend to rank better.
So then we studied if there was any correlation with number of “folders” in URL:
Here’s how we were counting them:
And the results of this experiment are pretty much in line with the previous one.
Somehow URLs with less folders tend to rank better.
SIDENOTEafter seeing this data a few people asked us to study how “# of clicks” from Homepage correlates with Google rank. We’ve already did that and the results will be published soon here at Ahrefs blog.
RECOMMENDATIONEven though we did see a small correlation here with preference towards shorter URLs, I don’t believe this is a significant enough ranking factor.
I do recommend you to keep your URLs short, but mostly for user experience reasons and not because this will help you rank higher.
6. Linking out to authority sites
We’ve all heard Google say that outbound links are not a ranking factor, right?
But at the same time we’ve seen some nice proof that they actually are.
And our own experiment resulted in a small positive correlation of pages that link to DR70+ sites VS Google ranking.
Does this mean this helps you rank better?
RECOMMENDATION
Even though we did see a positive correlation here, it is still very insignificant.
Probably in some cases when Google is lacking other ranking signals, it will have no choice but to take this into account.
But I don’t believe that there’s any way for you to use this tiny ranking factor to your advantage.
We’ve all heard Google say that outbound links are not a ranking factor, right?
But at the same time we’ve seen some nice proof that they actually are.
And our own experiment resulted in a small positive correlation of pages that link to DR70+ sites VS Google ranking.
Does this mean this helps you rank better?
RECOMMENDATIONEven though we did see a positive correlation here, it is still very insignificant.
Probably in some cases when Google is lacking other ranking signals, it will have no choice but to take this into account.
But I don’t believe that there’s any way for you to use this tiny ranking factor to your advantage.
7. Broken links
Broken links are considered a “bad user experience”, which Google might punish you for.
Well, according to our data only 2% of pages that rank in Google top 10 have broken links.
RECOMMENDATION
Obviously I don’t recommend you to have broken links on your website.
I don’t believe that Google will penalize you for having broken links, but I’m pretty sure that your visitors will get frustrated once they happen to click one.
Broken links are considered a “bad user experience”, which Google might punish you for.
Well, according to our data only 2% of pages that rank in Google top 10 have broken links.
RECOMMENDATIONObviously I don’t recommend you to have broken links on your website.
I don’t believe that Google will penalize you for having broken links, but I’m pretty sure that your visitors will get frustrated once they happen to click one.
8. Social Shares
Ever since our beloved social networking sites started counting the number of shares that a page has generated, the SEO community got filled with rumours of whether or not Google is using these numbers as one of its ranking factors.
So we decided to study how many of the pages that rank on the front page of Google have at least 1 social share on any of the major social networks.
And here’s what we’ve got:
Looks like roughly 70% of pages that are seen in Google top 10 have zero shares(based on our data sample).
And yet there’s still a very small positive correlation between having at least one share and ranking higher.
So then we dug a little deeper and studied the correlation between the # of social shares on each individual social network with Google rank.
And here’s what we’ve got:
The number of social shares correlated with Google rank quite decently(compared to other on page factors that we’ve studied).
But let’s not forget that correlation ≠ causation and it could easily be the other way around: people share these pages more often, because they rank high in Google.
RECOMMENDATION
It’s very hard to prove that the number of social shares has any influence on rankings.
Our data (as well as our guts) do tell us that this could really be a nice ranking factor, but at the same time I do admit that it is too easy to fake.
Ever since our beloved social networking sites started counting the number of shares that a page has generated, the SEO community got filled with rumours of whether or not Google is using these numbers as one of its ranking factors.
So we decided to study how many of the pages that rank on the front page of Google have at least 1 social share on any of the major social networks.
And here’s what we’ve got:
Looks like roughly 70% of pages that are seen in Google top 10 have zero shares(based on our data sample).
And yet there’s still a very small positive correlation between having at least one share and ranking higher.
So then we dug a little deeper and studied the correlation between the # of social shares on each individual social network with Google rank.
And here’s what we’ve got:
The number of social shares correlated with Google rank quite decently(compared to other on page factors that we’ve studied).
But let’s not forget that correlation ≠ causation and it could easily be the other way around: people share these pages more often, because they rank high in Google.
RECOMMENDATIONIt’s very hard to prove that the number of social shares has any influence on rankings.
Our data (as well as our guts) do tell us that this could really be a nice ranking factor, but at the same time I do admit that it is too easy to fake.
Relevance
The relevance of your page to a search query is something that we didn’t study at this time, but we do believe it plays a much more significant role than simply using an “exact match keyword” on your page.
Back to my example of SERP for the keyword “guest posting”:
Clearly Google understands that “guest posting” and “guest blogging” is pretty much the same thing and that is why when you google for “guest posting”, “guest blogging” and “guest writing” – you’ll see pretty much the same pages occupy top10 results (but in slightly different order).
The relevance of your page to a search query is something that we didn’t study at this time, but we do believe it plays a much more significant role than simply using an “exact match keyword” on your page.
Back to my example of SERP for the keyword “guest posting”:
Clearly Google understands that “guest posting” and “guest blogging” is pretty much the same thing and that is why when you google for “guest posting”, “guest blogging” and “guest writing” – you’ll see pretty much the same pages occupy top10 results (but in slightly different order).
Relevance beats backlinks.
Here’s a cool case that was brought up while discussing “on page SEO VS backlinks” the trenches.
Search Google for “chocolate lab” (Total search volume: 74,000):
How come pages with 19 and 26 referring domains outrank pages with 278 and 1100 referring domains?
Because they are more relevant!
The first two pages rank so high with less backlinks because they are talking specifically about “chocolate labs”.
I mean both these articles are entirely dedicated to THIS specific dog breed of THIS specific colour.
What about the other two articles?
These are general pages about labrador retriever dog breed that mention “chocolate labs” fleetingly.
Google only puts them on it’s front page because there’s not much relevant content that would talk about “chocolate labs” specifically.
And these two pages have too many backlinks to ignore them, even though they are too general.
I like to call this kind of scenario a “lack of relevant content in SERP”.
But how does Google know if your article is relevant to a search query or not?
And, most importantly, how can you make sure you’re sending the right “signals” to Google?
This article has some good answers: “More than Keywords: 7 Concepts of Advanced On-Page SEO”
Here’s a cool case that was brought up while discussing “on page SEO VS backlinks” the trenches.
Search Google for “chocolate lab” (Total search volume: 74,000):
How come pages with 19 and 26 referring domains outrank pages with 278 and 1100 referring domains?
Because they are more relevant!
The first two pages rank so high with less backlinks because they are talking specifically about “chocolate labs”.
I mean both these articles are entirely dedicated to THIS specific dog breed of THIS specific colour.
What about the other two articles?
These are general pages about labrador retriever dog breed that mention “chocolate labs” fleetingly.
Google only puts them on it’s front page because there’s not much relevant content that would talk about “chocolate labs” specifically.
And these two pages have too many backlinks to ignore them, even though they are too general.
I like to call this kind of scenario a “lack of relevant content in SERP”.
But how does Google know if your article is relevant to a search query or not?
And, most importantly, how can you make sure you’re sending the right “signals” to Google?
This article has some good answers: “More than Keywords: 7 Concepts of Advanced On-Page SEO”
Exact match keyword optimization works when there’s a lack of content and backlinks.
Let’s go back to that experiment by Distilled that I’ve mentioned earlier.
Please review a few important details behind this experiment:
#1 They were re-optimizing ~10,000 category pages.
Obviously, 99% of these pages don’t have any backlinks pointing at them.
You can easily check that in Ahrefs:
And the pages that they are competing with in Google SERP are pretty much in the same situation.
(everyone knows the challenges of building backlinks to tens of thousands of category pages, right?)
So that’s a “no backlinks” battle.
#2 All the keywords that they are targeting are “long tail”:
There’s no secret that long tail keywords are (generally) much-much less competitive than keywords with higher search volume.
So that’s a “long tail keywords” battle.
#3 These category pages don’t have any relevant content that Google could “read” and “understand”.
Title, URL and H1 is pretty much all clues that Google has about these pages:
So that is also a “no relevant content” battle.
And under these circumstances (no links, no content, long tail keywords) – it doesn’t surprise me that Google will refer to appearance of exact match keyword in Title, URL and H1 tags.
Let’s go back to that experiment by Distilled that I’ve mentioned earlier.
Please review a few important details behind this experiment:
#1 They were re-optimizing ~10,000 category pages.
Obviously, 99% of these pages don’t have any backlinks pointing at them.
You can easily check that in Ahrefs:
And the pages that they are competing with in Google SERP are pretty much in the same situation.
(everyone knows the challenges of building backlinks to tens of thousands of category pages, right?)
So that’s a “no backlinks” battle.
#2 All the keywords that they are targeting are “long tail”:
There’s no secret that long tail keywords are (generally) much-much less competitive than keywords with higher search volume.
So that’s a “long tail keywords” battle.
#3 These category pages don’t have any relevant content that Google could “read” and “understand”.
Title, URL and H1 is pretty much all clues that Google has about these pages:
So that is also a “no relevant content” battle.
And under these circumstances (no links, no content, long tail keywords) – it doesn’t surprise me that Google will refer to appearance of exact match keyword in Title, URL and H1 tags.
Back to you
This is it! We’ve shared all we got.
And more than anything we would love to hear what you guys think about it.
I know there are a lot of very experienced SEOs among our readers and I’m super excited to hear what you have to say about our research and the takeaways from it.
Also, note that the takeaways are based on analyzing the (very big) data and my own personal experience in SEO.
Ultimately however, they are my own opinions and I am happy to discuss where I might be wrong, or where the data may be open to other interpretations.
Do you have any interesting data or case studies that contradict our research? I’ll be happy to take a look!
See you in the comments!
This is it! We’ve shared all we got.
And more than anything we would love to hear what you guys think about it.
I know there are a lot of very experienced SEOs among our readers and I’m super excited to hear what you have to say about our research and the takeaways from it.
Also, note that the takeaways are based on analyzing the (very big) data and my own personal experience in SEO.
Ultimately however, they are my own opinions and I am happy to discuss where I might be wrong, or where the data may be open to other interpretations.
Do you have any interesting data or case studies that contradict our research? I’ll be happy to take a look!
See you in the comments!
Able To Prove God, Jesus Christ, The Holy Bible To Be Fact!!!
step-by-step system - how to build a profitable business on amazon
Skyrocketing Your income with Ultra Running Webinar
Learn How I Make $3,500 to $25,000 Monthly With Google & Clickbank
how to make over $1,000 per day with The Nuclear Affiliate System
wpsubscribers - the premium wordpress subscription plugin
GET PAID TO DRAW PICTURES AND TAKE PHOTOGRAPHS
legitimate online jobs
Skyrocketing Your income with Ultra Running Webinar
Learn How I Make $3,500 to $25,000 Monthly With Google & Clickbank
how to make over $1,000 per day with The Nuclear Affiliate System
wpsubscribers - the premium wordpress subscription plugin
GET PAID TO DRAW PICTURES AND TAKE PHOTOGRAPHS
legitimate online jobs
How to Whiten Your Skin Naturally - 100% Guarantee!
natural anti-aging shortcuts
the fat burning kitchen
Top secret fat loss
Love this Post? Spread the Word.
Berapa sih nilai dari blog gue DALAM DOLLAR ? http://richardnata.blogspot.com/2015/04/berapa-sih-nilai-dari-blog-gue-dalam.html
Need a professional writer? Fiction and non-fiction? contact richard.nata@yahoo.co.id
Let me introduce myself. My name is Richard Nata. I am an author, novelist, blogger and ghost writer. My articles, including short stories have been published in magazines and newspapers since 1994. I have written a lot of books, both fiction and non-fiction. So I was a professional in the field of writing, both fiction and non-fiction.
Need a professional writer? Fiction and non-fiction? contact richard.nata@yahoo.co.id
Let me introduce myself. My name is Richard Nata. I am an author, novelist, blogger and ghost writer. My articles, including short stories have been published in magazines and newspapers since 1994. I have written a lot of books, both fiction and non-fiction. So I was a professional in the field of writing, both fiction and non-fiction.
I was born in Jakarta, August 17, 1968.
In 1988, at the age of 20 years, I started working as an accounting staff. Age 24 years has occupied the position of Finance Manager. Age 26 years as a General Manager.
In 1994, my articles published in magazines and tabloids.
In 1997, I wrote a book entitled "Buku Pintar Mencari Kerja". This book is reprinted as much as 8 times. Through the book, the authors successfully helped tens of thousands of people get jobs at once successful in their careers. They were also successful when moving to work in other places.
In 1998, I started investing in shares on Bursa Efek Indonesia (Indonesia stock exchange). As a result of investing in the stock market then I can provide consulting services for companies that want to go public in Indonesia stock exchange.
more information :
1. IPO KAN PERUSAHAAN ANDA DI BEI, TRIK TERCEPAT MENJADIKAN ANDA SEORANG KONGLOMERAT. brand, ideas, story, style, my life: IPO KAN PERUSAHAAN ANDA DI BEI, TRIK TERCEPAT MENJADIKAN ANDA SEORANG KONGLOMERAT.
2. JASA KONSULTAN GO PUBLIC ( IPO ) DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA.
Lihat preview menurut Yahoo
In 2015, Richard Nata revise the "Buku Pintar Mencari Kerja" became BUKU PINTAR DAPAT KERJA GAJI TINGGI PINDAH KERJA GAJI SEMAKIN TINGGI
BUKU PINTAR DAPAT KERJA GAJI TINGGI PINDAH KERJA GAJI SEMAKIN TINGGI made by retyping the book BEST SELLER of the author, entitled “Buku Pintar Mencari Kerja”. This ebook available on google play.
In 2015, I had the idea of a startup company where the readers can decide for themselves the next story. WASN'T THIS A GREAT IDEA? IF can be realized WILL BE WORTH billions USD. Because CAN PRODUCE FOR MILLIONS OF DOLLARS even tens of millions USD annually.
In theory, in 10-20 years into the future, my startup income, amounting to hundreds of million USD annually can be obtained easily. AND IF FOLLOWED BY MANY COMPANIES IN THE WHOLE WORLD WILL THEN BE A NEW INDUSTRIAL worth trillions USD.
To be honest. Currently I'm not having a lot of money. So I start marketing my startup with blogspot.
My STARTUP :
I was born in Jakarta, August 17, 1968.
In 1988, at the age of 20 years, I started working as an accounting staff. Age 24 years has occupied the position of Finance Manager. Age 26 years as a General Manager.
In 1994, my articles published in magazines and tabloids.
In 1997, I wrote a book entitled "Buku Pintar Mencari Kerja". This book is reprinted as much as 8 times. Through the book, the authors successfully helped tens of thousands of people get jobs at once successful in their careers. They were also successful when moving to work in other places.
In 1998, I started investing in shares on Bursa Efek Indonesia (Indonesia stock exchange). As a result of investing in the stock market then I can provide consulting services for companies that want to go public in Indonesia stock exchange.
more information :
1. IPO KAN PERUSAHAAN ANDA DI BEI, TRIK TERCEPAT MENJADIKAN ANDA SEORANG KONGLOMERAT. brand, ideas, story, style, my life: IPO KAN PERUSAHAAN ANDA DI BEI, TRIK TERCEPAT MENJADIKAN ANDA SEORANG KONGLOMERAT.
| |||||||
2. JASA KONSULTAN GO PUBLIC ( IPO ) DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA.
| |||||||
Lihat preview menurut Yahoo
| |||||||
In 2015, Richard Nata revise the "Buku Pintar Mencari Kerja" became BUKU PINTAR DAPAT KERJA GAJI TINGGI PINDAH KERJA GAJI SEMAKIN TINGGI
BUKU PINTAR DAPAT KERJA GAJI TINGGI PINDAH KERJA GAJI SEMAKIN TINGGI made by retyping the book BEST SELLER of the author, entitled “Buku Pintar Mencari Kerja”. This ebook available on google play.
In 2015, I had the idea of a startup company where the readers can decide for themselves the next story. WASN'T THIS A GREAT IDEA? IF can be realized WILL BE WORTH billions USD. Because CAN PRODUCE FOR MILLIONS OF DOLLARS even tens of millions USD annually.
In theory, in 10-20 years into the future, my startup income, amounting to hundreds of million USD annually can be obtained easily. AND IF FOLLOWED BY MANY COMPANIES IN THE WHOLE WORLD WILL THEN BE A NEW INDUSTRIAL worth trillions USD.
To be honest. Currently I'm not having a lot of money. So I start marketing my startup with blogspot.
My STARTUP :
A story with millions of choices in it - looking investor like you.
Try to imagine this. When you're reading a story on the web or blog, you are given two choices. You can choose the next story based on your own choice. After selecting then you can continue reading the story. Shortly afterwards you will be presented back to the 2 other options. The next choice is up to you. Then you continue the story you are reading. After that you will be faced again with 2 choices. So onwards. The more stories you read so the more options you have taken.
If you feel curious then you can re-read the story by changing your selection. Then you will see a different story with the story that you have read previously. The question now is why is this so? Because the storyline will be varying according to your choice.
I, as the author is planning to make tens of thousands of articles with millions of choices in it. With tens of thousands of articles then you like to see a show of your favorite series on TV for several years. The difference is while watching your favorite TV series, then you can not change the story. Meanwhile, if you read this story then you can alter the way the story according to your own choice.
You might say like this. Sounds like a book "choose your own adventure". Books I read when I was young.
Correctly. The idea is taken from there. But if you read through a book, the story is not so exciting. Due to the limited number of pages. When a child first you may already feel interesting. But if you re-read the book now then becomes no fun anymore because you don't get anything with the amount of 100-200 pages.
Have you ever heard of game books? When you were boy or girl, did you like reading game books? I think you've heard even happy to read it.
Gamebooks are sometimes informally called choose your own adventure books or CYOA which is also the name of the Choose Your Own Adventure series published byBantam Books. Gamebook - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gamebook - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A gamebook is a work of fiction that allows the reader to participate in the story by making effective choices. The narrative branches along various paths through the use of numbered paragraphs or pages.
Bantam Books with the Choose Your Own Adventure
series has produced more than 250 million US
dollars. While I offer you more powerful than the Choose
Your Own Adventure. Because of what? Because the
story that I made much more interesting than the stories
created by the authors of Bantam Books. You will not get anything just to 100-200 pages. While the story that I created is made up of tens of thousands of articles with millions of choices in it.
For comparison are the books published with the theme "choose your own adventure" produces more than 250 million copies worldwide. If the average price of a book for 5 USD, the industry has produced more than 1.5 billion USD. But unfortunately this industry has been abandoned because the reader begins to feel bored. The last book was published entitled "The Gorillas of Uganda (prev." Search for the Mountain Gorillas ")". And this book was published in 2013.
Based on the above, then you are faced with two choices. Are you interested in reading my story is? Or you are not interested at all. The choice is in your hands.
If you are interested then spread widely disseminated this article to your family, friends, neighbors, and relatives. You can also distribute it on facebook, twitter, goggle +, or other social media that this article be viral in the world. By doing so it is a new entertainment industry has been created.
Its creator named Richard Nata.
The full articles that talks about this:
19. Start-up strategy in order to earn millions to tens of millions of dollars annually. http://richardnata.blogspot.com/2015/02/start-up-strategy-in-order-to-earn.html
20. Why do I need startup funds from investors? http://richardnata.blogspot.com/2015/05/why-do-i-need-startup-funds-from.html
21. slow but sure vs acceleration. http://richardnata.blogspot.com/2015/05/slow-but-sure-vs-acceleration.html
29. Start reading the story here. http://richardnata.blogspot.com/2015/05/start-reading-story-here.html
WHY DO I NEED STARTUP FUNDS FROM INVESTORS? I NEED A LOT OF FUNDS FROM INVESTORS BECAUSE I HAVE TO LOOKING FOR EXPERT PROGRAMMERS(IT).BECAUSE THE DATA IS HANDLED IS VERY LARGE, IT MAY HAVE TO WEAR SOME PROGRAMMERS(IT).
I CAN NOT WEAR SOME FREELANCE PROGRAMMER BECAUSE THE DATA MUST BE MONITORED CONTINUOUSLY FROM VIRUSES, MALWARE, SPAM, AND OTHERS.
IN ADDITION FUNDS FROM INVESTORS IS ALSO USED TO BUY SERVERS WITH VERY LARGE CAPACITY. FUNDS ARE ALSO USED TO PAY EMPLOYEE SALARIES AND OPERATIONAL COSTS OF THE COMPANY.
FUNDS CAN ALSO BE USED FOR ADVERTISING AND OTHER MARKETING STRATEGIES.FUNDS CAN ALSO BE USED TO ADVERTISE MY STARTUP AND OTHER MARKETING STRATEGIES.
IF I GET A VERY LARGE FUND, THE PART OF THE FUNDS USED TO TRANSLATE THE STORY INTO VARIOUS LANGUAGES.With more and more languages, the more readers we get.
WITH MORE AND MORE READERS, THE MORE REVENUE WE GET.
AS AN INVESTOR THEN YOU DO NOT HAVE TO FEEL ANXIOUS ABOUT YOUR FUNDS. BECAUSE YOUR FUNDS WILL NEVER BE LOST BECAUSE IN 3-5 YEARS YOU HAVE RETURNED THE FUNDS COUPLED WITH PROFIT.
THIS BUSINESS IS ONE AND THE ONLY ONE IN THE WORLD.
If we can make a good story, so that the readers will
come again and again for further reading the story then
our earnings will continue to grow and will never
diminish. This is due to new readers who continued to
arrive, while long remained loyal readers become our
customers.
So that the number of our readers will continue to
multiply over time. With the increasing number of loyal
readership then automatically the amount of income we
will also grow larger every year. The same thing
happened in yahoo, google, facebook, twitter, linkedin,
and others when they still startup.
Deuteronomy {28:13} And the LORD shall make thee the
head, and not the tail; and thou shalt be above only, and
thou shalt not be beneath; if that thou hearken unto the commandments of the LORD thy God, which I command thee this day, to observe and to do [them: ]
Try to imagine this. If I give a very unique story. It was the first time in the world. But the world already know this story even liked it. Because the world love the game books. While the story that I made is the development of game books.
Do you Believe if I dare say if I will succeed because my story will be famous all over the world as Harry Potter?
I believe it. Not because I was the author of the story, but because of the story that I made is unique and the only one in the world.
Income from my startup :
1. Ads. With millions of unique visitors, the price of the ads will be expensive.
3. Contribution of the readers. If you have a million readers and every reader to pay one US dollar per year then you will get the income of one million US dollars per year.
If you have a million readers and every reader to pay one US dollar per month then you will get as much revenue twelve million US dollars per year.
4. Books and Comics. After getting hundreds of thousands to the millions of readers of the story will be made in books and the form of a picture story (comics).
6. Merchandise related to characters. After the movies there will be made an offer for the sale of goods related to the characters.
7. Sales. With millions of email that we have collected from our readers so we can sell anything to them.
Each income (1-7) worth millions to tens of millions of US dollars.
Because each income (1-7) worth millions to tens of millions of US dollars. Then in 10-20 years into the future, AI will be earning hundreds of million USD annually.
So how long do you think my story that I made could gather a thousand readers? Ten thousand readers? One hundred thousand readers? A million readers? Five million readers? Ten million readers? More than ten million readers?
But to get all of it of course takes time, can not be instant. In addition, it takes hard work, big funds and placement of the right people in the right positions.
By advertising, viral marketing, strong marketing strategies and SEO then a million readers can be done in less than a year. Ten million readers can be done in two to three years.
This is the marketing strategy of my startup.
When hundreds of thousands or millions of readers already liked my story then they have to pay to enjoy the story that I made.
If you are a visionary then you will think like this.
With the help of my great name in the world of business, my expertise in marketing, advertising, marketing by mouth, viral marketing, then collecting a million readers to ten million readers will be easy to obtain. Is not that right?
The question now is what if people like my story as they like Harry Potter? You will get tens of millions or even hundreds of millions of email addresses from readers. With that much email, we can sell anything to the readers.
Since April 2013, Wikipedia has around 26 million articles in 285 languages are written by 39 million registered users and a variety of anonymous people who are not known from other parts of the world. Web ranked by Alexa, Wikipedia is a famous website number 6 which has been visited by 12% of all Internet users with 80 million visitors every month and it is only from the calculation of America.
resource : http://www.tahupedia.com/content/show/136/Sejarah-dan-Asal-Mula-Wikipedia
If no Wikipedia then need hundreds of thousands to millions of books required to make 26 million articles in 285 languages into books.
With the Wikipedia then people started to leave to read a book or books to seek knowledge about a subject or many subjects.
The same thing will happen. Read a story in a book or books to be abandoned. Read a story with millions of choices on the web or blog is far more interesting than reading a book or books.
So what happens next? In 10-20 years ahead then read a story in a book to be abandoned. Otherwise my startup will grow and continue to develop into a new entertainment industry.
New entertainment industry, where I was a forerunner startup will continue to evolve.
Therefore, in 10-20 years into the future, my startup will be earning hundreds of million USD annually.
So do not delay. Invest your money immediately to my startup. Take A Look. There are so many advantages if you want to invest in my startup.
WHY YOU SHOULD INVEST YOUR MONEY RIGHT NOW? .
IF YOU INVEST YOUR FUNDS IN ONE, TWO OR THREE YEARS INTO THE FUTURE, YOU MAY BE TOO LATE.
BECAUSE IN 1-3 YEARS INTO THE FUTURE THEN I'VE GOT THE FUNDS. THE FUNDS CAN COME FROM SOME INVESTORS, LOANS FROM BANKS OR FROM ADVERTISEMENTS POSTED ON MY BLOG.
IF I'VE GOT A LARGE AMOUNT OF FUNDS THEN I'VE NO NEED OF YOUR FUNDS. SO INVEST NOW OR NOT AT ALL.
My BLOG started to be written January 11, 2015. TODAY, MAY 30, 2015, THE NUMBER OF CLICKS HAS REACHED 56,750. SO FAR SO GOOD.
If I get big funds from investors then with a quick story that I wrote will spread throughout the world.
So I got acceleration because I can put ads in a large variety of media such as Google AdWords, Facebook, and others. I also can perform a variety of other marketing strategies.
If I do not get funding from investors then my story would still spread throughout the world. But with a longer time, Slow but sure.
So either I get funding from investors or not, the story that I wrote will remain spread throughout the world. Ha ... 7x
So don't worry, be happy.
My advice to you is you should think whether the data that I have provided to you makes sense or not .
If my data reasonable then immediately invest your funds as soon as possible.
Then we discuss how we plan further cooperation.
Thank you.
Try to imagine this. When you're reading a story on the web or blog, you are given two choices. You can choose the next story based on your own choice. After selecting then you can continue reading the story. Shortly afterwards you will be presented back to the 2 other options. The next choice is up to you. Then you continue the story you are reading. After that you will be faced again with 2 choices. So onwards. The more stories you read so the more options you have taken.
If you feel curious then you can re-read the story by changing your selection. Then you will see a different story with the story that you have read previously. The question now is why is this so? Because the storyline will be varying according to your choice.
You might say like this. Sounds like a book "choose your own adventure". Books I read when I was young.
Correctly. The idea is taken from there. But if you read through a book, the story is not so exciting. Due to the limited number of pages. When a child first you may already feel interesting. But if you re-read the book now then becomes no fun anymore because you don't get anything with the amount of 100-200 pages.
Correctly. The idea is taken from there. But if you read through a book, the story is not so exciting. Due to the limited number of pages. When a child first you may already feel interesting. But if you re-read the book now then becomes no fun anymore because you don't get anything with the amount of 100-200 pages.
Have you ever heard of game books? When you were boy or girl, did you like reading game books? I think you've heard even happy to read it.
Gamebooks are sometimes informally called choose your own adventure books or CYOA which is also the name of the Choose Your Own Adventure series published byBantam Books. Gamebook - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gamebook - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A gamebook is a work of fiction that allows the reader to participate in the story by making effective choices. The narrative branches along various paths through the use of numbered paragraphs or pages.
| ||||||
Bantam Books with the Choose Your Own Adventure
series has produced more than 250 million US
dollars. While I offer you more powerful than the Choose
Your Own Adventure. Because of what? Because the
story that I made much more interesting than the stories
created by the authors of Bantam Books. You will not get anything just to 100-200 pages. While the story that I created is made up of tens of thousands of articles with millions of choices in it.
series has produced more than 250 million US
dollars. While I offer you more powerful than the Choose
Your Own Adventure. Because of what? Because the
story that I made much more interesting than the stories
created by the authors of Bantam Books. You will not get anything just to 100-200 pages. While the story that I created is made up of tens of thousands of articles with millions of choices in it.
For comparison are the books published with the theme "choose your own adventure" produces more than 250 million copies worldwide. If the average price of a book for 5 USD, the industry has produced more than 1.5 billion USD. But unfortunately this industry has been abandoned because the reader begins to feel bored. The last book was published entitled "The Gorillas of Uganda (prev." Search for the Mountain Gorillas ")". And this book was published in 2013.
Based on the above, then you are faced with two choices. Are you interested in reading my story is? Or you are not interested at all. The choice is in your hands.
If you are interested then spread widely disseminated this article to your family, friends, neighbors, and relatives. You can also distribute it on facebook, twitter, goggle +, or other social media that this article be viral in the world. By doing so it is a new entertainment industry has been created.
Its creator named Richard Nata.
The full articles that talks about this:
19. Start-up strategy in order to earn millions to tens of millions of dollars annually. http://richardnata.blogspot.com/2015/02/start-up-strategy-in-order-to-earn.html
20. Why do I need startup funds from investors? http://richardnata.blogspot.com/2015/05/why-do-i-need-startup-funds-from.html
21. slow but sure vs acceleration. http://richardnata.blogspot.com/2015/05/slow-but-sure-vs-acceleration.html
20. Why do I need startup funds from investors? http://richardnata.blogspot.com/2015/05/why-do-i-need-startup-funds-from.html
21. slow but sure vs acceleration. http://richardnata.blogspot.com/2015/05/slow-but-sure-vs-acceleration.html
WHY DO I NEED STARTUP FUNDS FROM INVESTORS? I NEED A LOT OF FUNDS FROM INVESTORS BECAUSE I HAVE TO LOOKING FOR EXPERT PROGRAMMERS(IT).BECAUSE THE DATA IS HANDLED IS VERY LARGE, IT MAY HAVE TO WEAR SOME PROGRAMMERS(IT).
I CAN NOT WEAR SOME FREELANCE PROGRAMMER BECAUSE THE DATA MUST BE MONITORED CONTINUOUSLY FROM VIRUSES, MALWARE, SPAM, AND OTHERS.
IN ADDITION FUNDS FROM INVESTORS IS ALSO USED TO BUY SERVERS WITH VERY LARGE CAPACITY. FUNDS ARE ALSO USED TO PAY EMPLOYEE SALARIES AND OPERATIONAL COSTS OF THE COMPANY.
I CAN NOT WEAR SOME FREELANCE PROGRAMMER BECAUSE THE DATA MUST BE MONITORED CONTINUOUSLY FROM VIRUSES, MALWARE, SPAM, AND OTHERS.
IN ADDITION FUNDS FROM INVESTORS IS ALSO USED TO BUY SERVERS WITH VERY LARGE CAPACITY. FUNDS ARE ALSO USED TO PAY EMPLOYEE SALARIES AND OPERATIONAL COSTS OF THE COMPANY.
FUNDS CAN ALSO BE USED FOR ADVERTISING AND OTHER MARKETING STRATEGIES.FUNDS CAN ALSO BE USED TO ADVERTISE MY STARTUP AND OTHER MARKETING STRATEGIES.
IF I GET A VERY LARGE FUND, THE PART OF THE FUNDS USED TO TRANSLATE THE STORY INTO VARIOUS LANGUAGES.With more and more languages, the more readers we get.
WITH MORE AND MORE READERS, THE MORE REVENUE WE GET.
AS AN INVESTOR THEN YOU DO NOT HAVE TO FEEL ANXIOUS ABOUT YOUR FUNDS. BECAUSE YOUR FUNDS WILL NEVER BE LOST BECAUSE IN 3-5 YEARS YOU HAVE RETURNED THE FUNDS COUPLED WITH PROFIT.
THIS BUSINESS IS ONE AND THE ONLY ONE IN THE WORLD.
If we can make a good story, so that the readers will
come again and again for further reading the story then
our earnings will continue to grow and will never
diminish. This is due to new readers who continued to
arrive, while long remained loyal readers become our
customers.
come again and again for further reading the story then
our earnings will continue to grow and will never
diminish. This is due to new readers who continued to
arrive, while long remained loyal readers become our
customers.
So that the number of our readers will continue to
multiply over time. With the increasing number of loyal
readership then automatically the amount of income we
will also grow larger every year. The same thing
happened in yahoo, google, facebook, twitter, linkedin,
and others when they still startup.
multiply over time. With the increasing number of loyal
readership then automatically the amount of income we
will also grow larger every year. The same thing
happened in yahoo, google, facebook, twitter, linkedin,
and others when they still startup.
Deuteronomy {28:13} And the LORD shall make thee the
head, and not the tail; and thou shalt be above only, and
thou shalt not be beneath; if that thou hearken unto the commandments of the LORD thy God, which I command thee this day, to observe and to do [them: ]
head, and not the tail; and thou shalt be above only, and
thou shalt not be beneath; if that thou hearken unto the commandments of the LORD thy God, which I command thee this day, to observe and to do [them: ]
Try to imagine this. If I give a very unique story. It was the first time in the world. But the world already know this story even liked it. Because the world love the game books. While the story that I made is the development of game books.
Do you Believe if I dare say if I will succeed because my story will be famous all over the world as Harry Potter?
I believe it. Not because I was the author of the story, but because of the story that I made is unique and the only one in the world.
Income from my startup :
1. Ads. With millions of unique visitors, the price of the ads will be expensive.
3. Contribution of the readers. If you have a million readers and every reader to pay one US dollar per year then you will get the income of one million US dollars per year.
If you have a million readers and every reader to pay one US dollar per month then you will get as much revenue twelve million US dollars per year.
4. Books and Comics. After getting hundreds of thousands to the millions of readers of the story will be made in books and the form of a picture story (comics).
6. Merchandise related to characters. After the movies there will be made an offer for the sale of goods related to the characters.
7. Sales. With millions of email that we have collected from our readers so we can sell anything to them.
Each income (1-7) worth millions to tens of millions of US dollars.
Because each income (1-7) worth millions to tens of millions of US dollars. Then in 10-20 years into the future, AI will be earning hundreds of million USD annually.
So how long do you think my story that I made could gather a thousand readers? Ten thousand readers? One hundred thousand readers? A million readers? Five million readers? Ten million readers? More than ten million readers?
But to get all of it of course takes time, can not be instant. In addition, it takes hard work, big funds and placement of the right people in the right positions.
By advertising, viral marketing, strong marketing strategies and SEO then a million readers can be done in less than a year. Ten million readers can be done in two to three years.
This is the marketing strategy of my startup.
When hundreds of thousands or millions of readers already liked my story then they have to pay to enjoy the story that I made.
If you are a visionary then you will think like this.
With the help of my great name in the world of business, my expertise in marketing, advertising, marketing by mouth, viral marketing, then collecting a million readers to ten million readers will be easy to obtain. Is not that right?
The question now is what if people like my story as they like Harry Potter? You will get tens of millions or even hundreds of millions of email addresses from readers. With that much email, we can sell anything to the readers.
Since April 2013, Wikipedia has around 26 million articles in 285 languages are written by 39 million registered users and a variety of anonymous people who are not known from other parts of the world. Web ranked by Alexa, Wikipedia is a famous website number 6 which has been visited by 12% of all Internet users with 80 million visitors every month and it is only from the calculation of America.
resource : http://www.tahupedia.com/content/show/136/Sejarah-dan-Asal-Mula-Wikipedia
If no Wikipedia then need hundreds of thousands to millions of books required to make 26 million articles in 285 languages into books.
With the Wikipedia then people started to leave to read a book or books to seek knowledge about a subject or many subjects.
The same thing will happen. Read a story in a book or books to be abandoned. Read a story with millions of choices on the web or blog is far more interesting than reading a book or books.
So what happens next? In 10-20 years ahead then read a story in a book to be abandoned. Otherwise my startup will grow and continue to develop into a new entertainment industry.
New entertainment industry, where I was a forerunner startup will continue to evolve.
Therefore, in 10-20 years into the future, my startup will be earning hundreds of million USD annually.
So do not delay. Invest your money immediately to my startup. Take A Look. There are so many advantages if you want to invest in my startup.
WHY YOU SHOULD INVEST YOUR MONEY RIGHT NOW? .
IF YOU INVEST YOUR FUNDS IN ONE, TWO OR THREE YEARS INTO THE FUTURE, YOU MAY BE TOO LATE.
BECAUSE IN 1-3 YEARS INTO THE FUTURE THEN I'VE GOT THE FUNDS. THE FUNDS CAN COME FROM SOME INVESTORS, LOANS FROM BANKS OR FROM ADVERTISEMENTS POSTED ON MY BLOG.
IF I'VE GOT A LARGE AMOUNT OF FUNDS THEN I'VE NO NEED OF YOUR FUNDS. SO INVEST NOW OR NOT AT ALL.
BECAUSE IN 1-3 YEARS INTO THE FUTURE THEN I'VE GOT THE FUNDS. THE FUNDS CAN COME FROM SOME INVESTORS, LOANS FROM BANKS OR FROM ADVERTISEMENTS POSTED ON MY BLOG.
IF I'VE GOT A LARGE AMOUNT OF FUNDS THEN I'VE NO NEED OF YOUR FUNDS. SO INVEST NOW OR NOT AT ALL.
My BLOG started to be written January 11, 2015. TODAY, MAY 30, 2015, THE NUMBER OF CLICKS HAS REACHED 56,750. SO FAR SO GOOD.
If I get big funds from investors then with a quick story that I wrote will spread throughout the world.
So I got acceleration because I can put ads in a large variety of media such as Google AdWords, Facebook, and others. I also can perform a variety of other marketing strategies.
So I got acceleration because I can put ads in a large variety of media such as Google AdWords, Facebook, and others. I also can perform a variety of other marketing strategies.
If I do not get funding from investors then my story would still spread throughout the world. But with a longer time, Slow but sure.
So either I get funding from investors or not, the story that I wrote will remain spread throughout the world. Ha ... 7x
So don't worry, be happy.
So either I get funding from investors or not, the story that I wrote will remain spread throughout the world. Ha ... 7x
So don't worry, be happy.
My advice to you is you should think whether the data that I have provided to you makes sense or not .
If my data reasonable then immediately invest your funds as soon as possible.
Then we discuss how we plan further cooperation.
Thank you.
P.P.S. In addition, there is one more thing I
want to tell you. If a story can generate tens
of millions of US dollars, then what if made
P.P.S. In addition, there is one more thing I
want to tell you. If a story can generate tens
of millions of US dollars, then what if made
many stories? Then why do not you make 2, 3 or many stories? You will get hundreds of million USD annually.
many stories? Then why do not you make 2, 3 or many stories? You will get hundreds of million USD annually.
Worth spending time reading this blog! Amazingly written. Would love to read more useful blogs. Waiting for you to post more blogs of same pattern.
ReplyDeleteMy book on Amazon KDP.
ReplyDeleteHow to Create A Great Article for SEO in Three Hours.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1521169330?ref_=pe_870760_150889320 - paperback
https://www.amazon.com/author/richardnata - ebook
Thank you for your review.
Lord Jesus bless you.
Amen.